Inconsistencies in EM Theory - the Kelvin Polarization Force Density Contradiction

Inconsistencies in EM Theory - the Kelvin Polarization Force Density Contradiction

offline
  • Pridružio: 04 Nov 2018
  • Poruke: 1

Dear Forum Members,

Please excuse me for writing in English, I do understand Serbian and also speak the language somewhat, but during the many decades of not using it this knowledge became rusty. Therefore, if possible I would prefer to write in English, while you can write in Serbian.

You might be interested in my recent paper about the Kelvin polarization force anomaly that can be downloaded from:

vixra.org/pdf/1810.0468v2.pdf

Inconsistencies in EM Theory - the Kelvin Polarization Force Density Contradiction

Abstract
Calculations of resultant electrostatic force on a charged spherical or cylindrical capacitor with two sectors of different dielectrics, based on the classical formulas of electrostatic pressure, Kelvin polarization force density, and Maxwell stress tensor predict a reactionless force that violates Newton’s 3rd law. Measurements didn’t confirm the existence of such a reactionless thrust, thus there is an apparent inconsistency in the
classical EM theory that leads to wrong results.

If you find any error in it, or know the solution for the contradiction, then please let me know.

Thank you.

Best Regards,
Zoltan Losonc



Registruj se da bi učestvovao u diskusiji. Registrovanim korisnicima se NE prikazuju reklame unutar poruka.
Ko je trenutno na forumu
 

Ukupno su 290 korisnika na forumu :: 8 registrovanih, 0 sakrivenih i 282 gosta   ::   [ Administrator ] [ Supermoderator ] [ Moderator ] :: Detaljnije

Najviše korisnika na forumu ikad bilo je 1567 - dana 15 Jul 2016 19:18

Korisnici koji su trenutno na forumu:
Korisnici trenutno na forumu: _Sale, banjica, ivan979, royst33, ShurikSST, uruk, VJ, zlaya011