jos jedan test antivirusa - italijanski

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Ko ume da nam prevede, neka kaze sta sve pise...ono sto na "prvu loptu" razumem da je test radjen sa samo 12000 uzoraka i da je meren procenat detekcije i vreme za koje je skeniranje izvrseno:

http://www.programmifree.com/confronto-antivirus2006.htm

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Babelfish prevod:
The comparison has been executed from Programmifree.com to beginning 2006, on a champion of approximately 12000 files infects from virus (from most innocuous to most harmful, is old that recent), worm, Trojan and other trash of varied kind. These files have been scompatta in one folder to you and from lì made to analyze several the antivirus ones.

Every antivirus it has been regulated to the maximum of its abilities to scansion.

In it turns out to you brought back here under, has not been taken in consideration the eventual increase in weight of the operating system, but exclusively the ability to identify virus ( the comparison in speed and lightness of the antivirus ones has been instead made in July 2005). All the antivirus presents have been dawn to you endured before executing the test

   Time for the scansion
1    Kaspersky Personal For 5    to shareware    94.35 %    4' 27 "
1    Antivir PE    to freeware    94.35 %    2' 25 "
3    F-Secure 2006    to shareware    94.00 %    3' 50 "
4    McAfee Internet Sec 2006    to shareware    93.97 %    5' 45 "
5    BitDefender 9    to shareware    93.91%    2' 59 "
6    BitDefender 8 free    to freeware    93.77 %    2' 02 "
7    Antivirus Norton 2006    they trades    93.67 %    18' 40 "
8    Antivirus Symantec Corporate 10    they trades    93.65%    2404' 45"
9    McAfee Enterprise 8.0i    they trades    93.55 %    8' 40 "
10    Panda Titanium 2006    to shareware    93.53%    5' 40 "
11    Trend Internet Security 2006    to shareware    92.94 %    19' 15 "
12    ClamWin 0.87.1    open source    91.41 %    2' 32 "
13    Avast! 4 Home    to freeware    91.40 %    4' 15 "
14    F-Prot 3.16d    to shareware    88.78 %    2' 20 "
15    AVG 7,1 free    to freeware    87.23 %    45' 51 "
16    EZ trust    to shareware    84.42 %    13' 03 "
17    NOD32    to shareware    78.10 %    1' 10 "
                    
FAMOUS: Kaspersky Personal has caught up the same ones practically turns out you of the version for (94,34%). In this test - that it regards the abilities to scansion of an antivirus ones have been inserted also Bitdefender 8 free and Clamwin that do not have the functionality of scansion in real time.

The time for the scansion regards the scansion of the 12000 files infects. The speed of scansion of files does not infect can be much various one from the speed of scansion of files does not infect, as shown in the last test of this comparison (it depends insomma on the antivirus ones): as an example Antivirus Symantec Corporate 10 enters in letargo when it finds of the virus... has employed beyond 40 hours in order to execute the test (that I have repeated others 2 times on reduced champions and installations of clean Windows because I did not believe to my eyes).

CONSIDERATIONS: Interesting E' to see that best the antivirus ones are more or less on the same line, and that this antivirus year free (Antivir PE in head) does not disfigure regarding those to payment (everyone will be able to have of the own limitations - and also comprehensible regarding those to payment, however they make one figure than good more).

To notice that 1% of difference between antivirus and an other begin already to meaningful being, because on tens of migliaia of virus in circulation (if not hundred of thousands), 1% in less means to be exposed to hundred (perhaps a thousand and beyond) of virus in more.

Remembering that it turns out you of this comparison they are worth exclusively for the virus present and passed... not there is guarantee that (the good) performances puts into effect them is reflected in those future (even if effectively confronting these it turns out to you with those of the 2004 main positions change little).


Dovoljno da zakljucimo da je babelfish los automatski prevodilac

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

evo vam onda i Google prevod - mozda nekom pomogne...

Citat:The comparison has been executed from Programmifree.com to beginning 2006, on a champion of approximately 12000 files infects from virus (from most innocuous to most harmful, is old that recent), worm, Trojan and other trash of varied kind. These files have been scompatta in one folder to you and from lì made to analyze several the antivirus ones.

Every antivirus it has been regulated to the maximum of its abilities to scansion.

In it turns out to you brought back here under, has not been taken in consideration the eventual increase in weight of the operating system, but exclusively the ability to identify virus ( the comparison in speed and lightness of the antivirus ones has been instead made in July 2005). All the antivirus presents have been dawn to you endured before executing the test

Posiz Name
Licence
Virus characterizes to you
Time for the scansion
1 Kaspersky Personal For 5 to shareware 94.35 % 4' 27 "
1 Antivir PE to freeware 94.35 % 2' 25 "
3 F-Secure 2006 to shareware 94.00 % 3' 50 "
4 McAfee Internet Sec 2006 to shareware 93.97 % 5' 45 "
5 BitDefender 9 to shareware 93.91% 2' 59 "
6 BitDefender 8 free to freeware 93.77 % 2' 02 "
7 Antivirus Norton 2006 they trades 93.67 % 18' 40 "
8 Antivirus Symantec Corporate 10 they trades 93.65% 2404' 45"
9 McAfee Enterprise 8.0i they trades 93.55 % 8' 40 "
10 Panda Titanium 2006 to shareware 93.53% 5' 40 "
11 Trend Internet Security 2006 to shareware 92.94 % 19' 15 "
12 ClamWin 0.87.1 open source 91.41 % 2' 32 "
13 Avast! 4 Home to freeware 91.40 % 4' 15 "
14 F-Prot 3.16d to shareware 88.78 % 2' 20 "
15 AVG 7,1 free to freeware 87.23 % 45' 51 "
16 EZ trust to shareware 84.42 % 13' 03 "
17 NOD32 to shareware 78.10 % 1' 10 "


FAMOUS : Kaspersky Personal has caught up the same ones practically turns out you of the version for (94,34%). In this test - that it regards the abilities to scansion of an antivirus ones have been inserted also Bitdefender 8 free and Clamwin that do not have the functionality of scansion in real time.
The time for the scansion regards the scansion of the 12000 files infects . The speed of scansion of files does not infect can be much various one from the speed of scansion of files does not infect, as shown in the last test of this comparison (it depends insomma on the antivirus ones): as an example Antivirus Symantec Corporate 10 enters in letargo when it finds of the virus... has employed beyond 40 hours in order to execute the test (that I have repeated others 2 times on reduced champions and installations of clean Windows because I did not believe to my eyes).

CONSIDERATIONS : Interesting E' to see that best the antivirus ones are more or less on the same line, and that this antivirus year free (Antivir PE in head) does not disfigure regarding those to payment (everyone will be able to have of the own limitations - and also comprehensible regarding those to payment, however they make one figure than good more).

To notice that 1% of difference between antivirus and an other begin already to meaningful being, because on tens of migliaia of virus in circulation (if not hundred of thousands), 1% in less means to be exposed to hundred (perhaps a thousand and beyond) of virus in more.

Remembering that it turns out you of this comparison they are worth exclusively for the virus present and passed... not there is guarantee that (the good) performances puts into effect them is reflected in those future (even if effectively confronting these it turns out to you with those of the 2004 main positions change little).

Dopuna: 10 Feb 2006 18:34

ups... pa, to su isti prevodi

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Na kraju cu se uveriti da je nas test jedan od najozbiljnijih AV Testova u svetu, gledajuci kako su 'ozbiljni' drugi testovi...
12.000 virusa, ajde to vise manje, ali je fazon sto se vecina AV testova koje videh zasniva na samo jednom testu... nabacaju viruse na kup, i puste scan, i to je ceo test...

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

17 NOD32 to shareware 78.10 % 1' 10 "

????

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Ovaj italijanski test je pravi test za najsire narodne mase. Ionako se svi prepucavaju oko toga ciji je AV uhvatio vise napasti i ciji je brzi. Uglavnom, MC test je svakako najopsirniji test na koji sam naisao. Mada mi je u pocetku bio sumnjiv zbog nekih (ne)ocekivanih rezultata, a i bio vam je prvi, sada sam uveren da niste omanuli.

Dopuna: 10 Feb 2006 20:23

Da dodam. Mozda biste mogli u sledeci MC test da uvrstite i vreme skeniranja cistog i zarazenog sistema. Mislim Symantec corporate 40 sati a NOD 1 minut?! (Ako sam dobro procitao). Covece, mani % detekcije, ovde je brzina prvih 100 razloga za NOD. Mada, na cistom sistemu verovatno ne bi bila ovakva razlika?

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

@ilidan
vreme skeniranja je relativno, i zavisi od sposobnosti AV-a da radi sa packerima.
Problem je sto nas test ne radi jedan covek, pa vreme skeniranja zavisi od konfiguracije na kojoj je radjen test...

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

@ilidan

jes brz NOD... tako bi bio brz i atleticar koji trci 3000 stiplcez a ne preskace prepreke... sigurno prvi na kraju )))

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Al ima neceg sto mi nije jasno..

McAfee Internet Sec 2006 ispred BitDefender-A

a AntiVir bolji od F-Secure ... nesto mi tu ne ide...

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

mali uzorak... svega 15% od uzorka ozbiljnih testova