|
|
|
Poslao: 25 Dec 2010 00:40
|
offline
- Simke
- Mod u pemziji
- Pridružio: 21 Jul 2007
- Poruke: 9424
- Gde živiš: Kako kad
|
Jel ima to cudo manuelni update? Posto vidim da mu je baza vec 80MB  .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 25 Dec 2010 00:54
|
offline
- Pridružio: 19 Sep 2010
- Poruke: 39
|
CCE je samo skener koji se izvrsava iz otpakovanog foldera, tj iz CCE aplikacije. Nakon pokretanja i odabira za Full scan trazio mi je restartovanje sistema i sam pokrenuo azuriranje definicija. Te definicije ostaju u podfolderu scanners, bases.cav i koliko vidim iznose 123 MB 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 25 Dec 2010 02:44
|
offline
- 1l padr1n0
- Anti Malware Fighter
Rank 2
- Pridružio: 02 Feb 2008
- Poruke: 14018
- Gde živiš: Nish
|
Ovo je nesto slicno kao i Kaspersky Virus Removal Tool 2010:
[Link mogu videti samo ulogovani korisnici]
+ KillSwitch koji deluje zanimljivo na prvi pogled.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 26 Dec 2010 00:52
|
offline
- dr_Bora
- Anti Malware Fighter
Rank 2
- Pridružio: 24 Jul 2007
- Poruke: 12280
- Gde živiš: Höganäs, SE
|
Izgleda da je KillSwitch građen na open source programu Process Hacker i da autor istoga nije srećan
Citat:I appreciate the fact that you took my program and integrated it with your technologies. But the usage of my code is simply unacceptable. Do you guys know what the GNU GPL actually says? You must release source code for each binary release. You have not done so.
I see you've also taken advantage of the exception I put in the license allowing for dynamic linking regardless of license. This was intended for plugins, not the way you're using it (putting most of your code in another DLL to get around the GPL). You almost make me regret putting that exception in.
BTW: Thanks for taking almost complete credit for the tool. My two years of work on Process Hacker have obviously been well accounted for.
EDIT: "Patent pending"? I hope the clauses added in GPLv3 will make whatever patents you are granted completely worthless.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poslao: 26 Dec 2010 01:38
|
offline
- Pridružio: 19 Sep 2010
- Poruke: 39
|
dr_Bora ::Izgleda da je KillSwitch građen na open source programu Process Hacker i da autor istoga nije srećan
Citat:I appreciate the fact that you took my program and integrated it with your technologies. But the usage of my code is simply unacceptable. Do you guys know what the GNU GPL actually says? You must release source code for each binary release. You have not done so.
I see you've also taken advantage of the exception I put in the license allowing for dynamic linking regardless of license. This was intended for plugins, not the way you're using it (putting most of your code in another DLL to get around the GPL). You almost make me regret putting that exception in.
BTW: Thanks for taking almost complete credit for the tool. My two years of work on Process Hacker have obviously been well accounted for.
EDIT: "Patent pending"? I hope the clauses added in GPLv3 will make whatever patents you are granted completely worthless.
citat :
Our intention has been made very clear and we are more than happy to release the relevant code to be public.
Here is some excerpts that led us believe that when doing a beta (unfinished work) to our own private users (its like an extension of our organisation) it was ok not to release the code.
[Link mogu videti samo ulogovani korisnici]
"Does the GPL require that source code of modified versions be posted to the public?
The GPL does not require you to release your modified version, or any part of it. You are free to make modifications and use them privately, without ever releasing them. This applies to organizations (including companies), too; an organization can make a modified version and use it internally without ever releasing it outside the organization.
But if you release the modified version to the public in some way, the GPL requires you to make the modified source code available to the program's users, under the GPL.
Thus, the GPL gives permission to release the modified program in certain ways, and not in other ways; but the decision of whether to release it is up to you."
but the last thing i want is to get into a pissing contest with anyone over this..
We want to work with you, we both are doing work for end users we are both wanting them to benefit from it for free!
All the credit goes to you for Process Hacker. But the ability to show untrusted processes and ability to kill them is a new idea patented by Comodo. at no stage did we want to undermine your credit at all!
So lets work together...its in the interest of end users.
Melih
PS: We are now emailing eachother...so hope to sort it out over emails..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
