Razvoj antimaterijskih motora za letove u svemir

• 1Ovo se svidja korisniku: mcrule
  
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Nasa je pokrenula program razvoja novih antimaterijskih motora koji bi generisali gama zrake mnogo nize energije od postijecih (antimaterijski motori kao nusprodukt stvorene energije daju gama zrake velike energije koji izazivaju i raspadanje samih motora).

Izvor: http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/news/topstory/2006/antimatter_spaceship.html

New and Improved Antimatter Spaceship for Mars Missions

Most self-respecting starships in science fiction stories use antimatter as fuel for a good reason – it’s the most potent fuel known. While tons of chemical fuel are needed to propel a human mission to Mars, just tens of milligrams of antimatter will do (a milligram is about one-thousandth the weight of a piece of the original M&M candy).

However, in reality this power comes with a price. Some antimatter reactions produce blasts of high energy gamma rays. Gamma rays are like X-rays on steroids. They penetrate matter and break apart molecules in cells, so they are not healthy to be around. High-energy gamma rays can also make the engines radioactive by fragmenting atoms of the engine material.

The NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts (NIAC) is funding a team of researchers working on a new design for an antimatter-powered spaceship that avoids this nasty side effect by producing gamma rays with much lower energy.

Antimatter is sometimes called the mirror image of normal matter because while it looks just like ordinary matter, some properties are reversed. For example, normal electrons, the familiar particles that carry electric current in everything from cell phones to plasma TVs, have a negative electric charge. Anti-electrons have a positive charge, so scientists dubbed them "positrons".

When antimatter meets matter, both annihilate in a flash of energy. This complete conversion to energy is what makes antimatter so powerful. Even the nuclear reactions that power atomic bombs come in a distant second, with only about three percent of their mass converted to energy.

(Dalje na izvornom sajtu)

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

Mogao bi prevod da se postavi ! Pozdrav !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

fiko ::Mogao bi prevod da se postavi ! Pozdrav !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Zasto? Vreme je da se nauci engleski. Vec smo o tome pricali na ovom forumu, prevod je cista dobra volja, nije obaveza.
Potrudi se malo.

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

ja neću da učim engleski da bi na domaćim forumima nešto mogao da pročitam.
prvo zato što imam već dosta godina da bih sad učio ponovo ono što sam učio sedam godina i znam da čitam tečno nemam problema čak ni sa nejim stručnim stvarima samo prevod mi jako slabo ide pa pošto vi znate engleski pogledajte da li ovi motori imaju veze sa ovim nasinim baš me interesuje

[Link mogu videti samo ulogovani korisnici]

koliko vidim na slikama nema sličnosti a dali objašnjavaju princip rada.

• 0Niko još nije pohvalio poruku.
  Registruj se da bi pohvalio/la poruku!

@Shikazu

Istina... Zastarelo, ali prvo sto im je palo na pamet - poznat motor, samo se eksperimentise sa gorivom... Ako (kad) budu uspeli da naprave ovakav motor koji ce normalno raditi na pozitronski pogon, lako ce da krenu u dizajn novog motora...