Najave desavanja u astronautici

1

Najave desavanja u astronautici

offline
  • Pridružio: 18 Dec 2003
  • Poruke: 7953
  • Gde živiš: Graceland

Discovery - 15. maj
Atlantis - 12. jul
http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/1680.html

Dopuna: 28 Feb 2005 9:19

Nova britanska misija na Mars, jesen 2009.
Mars

Dopuna: 28 Feb 2005 9:21

Japanska astronomska misija moze da bude i baza na Mesecu naseljena ljudima!
Mesec

Dopuna: 01 Mar 2005 9:19

Jos malo o planovima Japanaca:
Ovde

Dopuna: 14 Mar 2005 8:56

Novi direktor NASA-e fizicar Michael Griffin
http://www.mycity.rs/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=12048

Dopuna: 22 Mar 2005 9:12

Evo akcije koju NASA priprema, a za koju se nada da nece morati nikad da primeni:
Ovde

Dopuna: 05 Apr 2005 11:58

Prva NASA-ina robotska letelica se lansira 15.4.

Dopuna: 06 Apr 2005 10:42

Misija na Marsu se produzava 18 meseci

Dopuna: 12 Apr 2005 12:34

Rusi i Evropljani postigli dogovor o izgradnji novog mesta za lansiranje



Registruj se da bi učestvovao u diskusiji. Registrovanim korisnicima se NE prikazuju reklame unutar poruka.
offline
  • Pridružio: 18 Dec 2003
  • Poruke: 7953
  • Gde živiš: Graceland

Ruski svemirski brod sa Amerikancima i Italijanima odleteo ka ISSu
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=15.....issitalyus

Dopuna: 21 Apr 2005 9:20

Pomereno lansiranje satla!
Ovde



offline
  • Stane 
  • Legendarni građanin
  • Pridružio: 13 Jan 2004
  • Poruke: 3590
  • Gde živiš: Niš

Testing a Sun-Powered Space Sail

http://www.mycity.rs/phpbb/viewtopic.php?p=155001#155001

offline
  • Pridružio: 18 Dec 2003
  • Poruke: 7953
  • Gde živiš: Graceland

Naucnici ce lansirati Phoenix na Mars 2007!
Ovde

Dopuna: 16 Jun 2005 9:28

Diskaveri spreman za polazak?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4095360.stm

Dopuna: 11 Jul 2005 10:48

Datum lansiranja Diskaverija
http://www.mycity.rs/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=17293

Lansiranje Diskaverija budi losa secanja
http://www.mycity.rs/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=17688

offline
  • Pridružio: 10 Feb 2005
  • Poruke: 3549

Let oko sveta na solarni pogon

A Swiss adventurer announced this week he plans to fly around the world in a solar powered airplane.

Bertrand Piccard is building the craft, called Solar Impluse, with the help of the European Space Agency (ESA). The purpose of his flight, scheduled for 2010, is to show what renewable energies and new technologies can do.

"Solar Impulse will promote the idea of a new aviation era using cleaner planes powered by the almost infinite energy of the Sun rather than the dirty, finite reserves of fossil fuels," Piccard said.

The space agency relies on the Sun to power its satellites, and has developed "efficient solar cells, intelligent energy management systems and resourceful storage systems," said Pierre Brisson, head of ESAÕs Technology Transfer Program.

"We will make available this expertise, together with our advanced technologies, to support PiccardÕs effort to demonstrate the potential of sustainable development," Brisson said.

In 1999, Piccard made the first non-stop around the world balloon-flight. His copilot for that flight, Brian Jones, will be one of Solar ImpulseÕs three pilots. When Solar Impulse makes its journey in 2010, Piccard and Andre Borschberg, Solar ImpulseÕs CEO, will join Jones in the cockpit.

"Although in its present design the craft will never be able to carry many passengers we believe that Solar Impulse can spark awareness about the technologies that can make sustainable development possible," Piccard said.

The non-stop trip around the world will take place in five stages, each lasting three to five days. Piccard plans to fly West to East, 10 to 30 degrees north of the Equator, to take advantage of prevailing winds and sunlight.

The conceptual design for Solar Impulse was displayed in June at the Le Bourget air show. For the plane to be ready for its 2010 flight, Piccard and his crew must follow a tight schedule. Detailed designs and assembly of the plane must be complete by 2007, the first test flights – day and night – must be done by 2008, and multiple day solar flights have to be done by 2009.

In other projects, ESA has helped developed solar powered cars and even race cars that run on more environmentally friendly fuels.

Ovde

offline
  • Pridružio: 10 Feb 2005
  • Poruke: 3549

Napusteni Apolo

July 11, 2005: Inside the lunar lander Challenger, a radio loudspeaker razbijacled.

Houston: "We've got you on television now. We have a good picture."

Gene Cernan, Apollo 17 commander: "Glad to see old Rover's still working."

"Rover," the moon buggy, sat outside with no one in the driver's seat, its side-mounted TV camera fixed on Challenger. Back in Houston and around the world, millions watched. The date was Dec. 19, 1972, and history was about to be made.

Suddenly, soundlessly, Challenger split in two. The base of the ship, the part with the landing pads, stayed put. The top, the lunar module with Cernan and Jack Schmitt inside, blasted off in a spray of gold foil. It rose, turned, and headed off to rendezvous with the orbiter America, the craft that would take them home again.

Those were the last men on the Moon. After they were gone, the camera panned back and forth. There was no one there, nothing, only the rover, the lander and some equipment scattered around the dusty floor of the Taurus-Littrow valley. Eventually, Rover's battery died and the TV transmissions stopped.

That was our last good look at an Apollo landing site.

Many people find this surprising, even disconcerting. Conspiracy theorists have long insisted that NASA never went to the Moon. It was all a hoax, they say, a way to win the Space Race by trickery. The fact that Apollo landing sites have not been photographed in detail since the early 1970s encourages their claims.

And why haven't we photographed them? There are six landing sites scattered across the Moon. They always face Earth, always in plain view. Surely the Hubble Space Telescope could photograph the rovers and other things astronauts left behind. Right?

Wrong. Not even Hubble can do it. The Moon is 384,400 km away. At that distance, the smallest things Hubble can distinguish are about 60 meters wide. The biggest piece of left-behind Apollo equipment is only 9 meters across and thus smaller than a single pixel in a Hubble image.

Better pictures are coming. In 2008 NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter will carry a powerful modern camera into low orbit over the Moon's surface. Its primary mission is not to photograph old Apollo landing sites, but it will photograph them, many times, providing the first recognizable images of Apollo relics since 1972.

The spacecraft's high-resolution camera, called "LROC," short for Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera, has a resolution of about half a meter. That means that a half-meter square on the Moon's surface would fill a single pixel in its digital images.

Apollo moon buggies are about 2 meters wide and 3 meters long. So in the LROC images, those abandoned vehicles will fill about 4 by 6 pixels.

What does a half-meter resolution picture look like? This image of an airport on Earth has the same resolution as an LROC image. Moon buggy-sized objects (automobiles and luggage carts) are clear:

"I would say the rovers will look angular and distinct," says Mark Robinson, research associate professor at Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois, and Principal Investigator for LROC. "We might see some shading differences on top from seats, depending on the sun angle. Even the rovers' tracks might be detectable in some instances."


Even more recognizable will be the discarded lander platforms. Their main bodies are 4 meters on a side, and so will fill an 8 by 8 pixel square in the LROC images. The four legs jutting out from the platforms' four corners span a diameter of 9 meters. So, from landing pad to landing pad, the landers will occupy about 18 pixels in LROC images, more than enough to trace their distinctive shapes.

Shadows help, too. Long black shadows cast across gray lunar terrain will reveal the shape of what cast them: the rovers and landers. "During the course of its year-long mission, LROC will image each landing site several times with the sunlight at different angles each time," says Robinson. Comparing the different shadows produced would allow for a more accurate analysis of the shape of the objects.

Enough nostalgia. LROC's main mission is about the future. According to NASA's Vision for Space Exploration, astronauts are returning to the Moon no later than 2020. Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter is a scout. It will sample the Moon's radiation environment, search for patches of frozen water, make laser maps of lunar terrain and, using LROC, photograph the Moon's entire surface. By the time astronauts return, they'll know the best places to land and much of what awaits them.

Two high-priority targets for LROC are the Moon's poles.

see caption"We're particularly interested in the poles as a potential location for a moon base," Robinson explains. "There are some cratered regions near the poles that are in shadow year-round. These places might be cold enough to harbor permanent deposits of water ice. And nearby are high regions that are sunlit all year. With constant sunlight for warmth and solar power, and a potential source of water nearby, these high regions would make an ideal location for a base." Data from LROC will help pinpoint the best ridge or plateau for setting up a lunar home.


Once a moonbase is established, what's the danger of it being hit by a big meteorite? LROC will help answer that question.

"We can compare LROC images of the Apollo landing sites with Apollo-era photos," says Robinson. The presence or absence of fresh craters will tell researchers something about the frequency of meteor strikes.

LROC will also be hunting for ancient hardened lava tubes. These are cave-like places, hinted at in some Apollo images, where astronauts could take shelter in case of an unexpected solar storm. A global map of these natural storm shelters will help astronauts plan their explorations.

No one knows what else LROC might find. The Moon has never been surveyed in such detail before. Surely new things await; old abandoned spaceships are just the beginning.


Ovde

offline
  • Pridružio: 10 Feb 2005
  • Poruke: 3549

Sledece gorivo raketa,vosak

Waiting inside his Mercury capsule for the command that would start the countdown and make him the first American in space, Alan Shepard yelled impatiently, "Let's light this candle!"

Those words may turn out to be more prophetic than Shepard intended.

Since 2001, NASA's Ames Research Center has been testing a new rocket fuel made from--believe it or not--candle wax.

"We actually ordered the wax for our test firings through a commercial Web site that sells candle wax in bulk," says Arif Karabeyoglu, who developed the theory behind paraffin-based rocket fuels and is currently a research associate at Stanford University.

"We use the exact same wax found in 'hurricane' candles," he says.


Safer to handle and better for the environment than today's solid rocket fuels, this modern twist on an ancient fuel could someday propel sounding rockets and commercial-payload rockets into space. It could even form the heart of a new generation of shuttle solid rocket boosters (SRBs) that would have a key safety feature today's SRBs lack: an "off" switch.

This may seem a shockingly primitive fuel for 21st Century rocket technology. After all, humans have been burning candles (today often made of "paraffin" wax) for the last five millennia. Why didn't someone think of using it for rockets before?

As anyone who's lit a candle knows, paraffin normally burns quite calmly, and it's difficult to make it burn at all without a wick. By all appearances, it just wasn't the kind of high-powered, explosive fuel needed to blast a rocket off of the planet!

Working in collaboration with David Altman, currently president of Space Propulsion Group, and Brian Cantwell, a professor at Stanford, Karabeyoglu figured out a way to make paraffin burn three times faster than had ever been achieved before--fast enough to serve as rocket fuel.

see caption In their design, the paraffin burns in the presence of pure oxygen gas. This alone causes it to burn much hotter than it does in air, which is only about 21% oxygen. That much had been done before. Karabeyoglu's innovation was to blow the oxygen past the melted surface of the paraffin fast enough to "whip up" this surface, like the ocean's choppy surface on a windy day. The "sea spray" of paraffin droplets that this kicks up burns very rapidly, tripling the combustion rate of the fuel.


More than 40 test firings by the Stanford-Ames collaborative project have shown that the idea works as advertised. That's good news for the rocket industry, because this paraffin fuel would be much simpler and safer to work with than the toxic, explosive fuels used today.

Just think of a household candle. You can safely carve it, melt it, and mold it. If it's free from artificial colors or perfumes, you could even lick it or chew on it. You could burn dozens of them in a room with no fear of toxic gases making you sick.

Don't try any of these things with conventional solid rocket fuels!

One reason for the benign nature of candle wax is that the oxidizer needed for it to burn is separate from the wax itself: air in the case of candles, and pure oxygen for rockets. (Chemically speaking, combustion is the rapid "oxidation" of the fuel, usually by combining with the oxygen gas in the air. That's why fires go out when deprived of air.) This kind of rocket with a solid fuel and a separate gaseous or liquid oxidizer is called a "hybrid" rocket.



It's not friendly for the environment either. When today's solid fuels burn, they produce the acidic compound hydrogen chloride and other noxious chemicals. When it rains, these compounds find their way into lakes and soils, and the increased acidity can harm plant and animal life.

Paraffin, in contrast, burns cleanly. The only gases left behind are water vapor and carbon dioxide. Rocket launches are still so rare that the total pollution they emit is tiny compared to that from cars, airplanes, and coal-fired power plants. But in the future, as more countries and private companies begin launching people and payloads into space, clean-burning rocket fuels will become an increasingly important environmental issue.

Using hybrid rockets would make all these rocket launches a bit safer as well.

By controlling the flow of the oxidizing gas, "hybrid rockets ... can be throttled over a wide range, including shut-down and restart," Cantwell said in a prepared statement. "That's one reason why they could be considered as possible replacements for the shuttle's current solid rocket boosters that cannot be shut off after they are lit."

"A hybrid rocket equivalent to the space shuttle's solid rockets would be about the same diameter, but would be somewhat longer," Cantwell continues. "One design concept being considered is a new hybrid booster rocket that is able to fly back to the launch site for recharging," he says, which would save considerable cost and time in preparing the boosters for the next launch.


However, we won't be seeing paraffin-based shuttle SRBs for many years to come, if ever, Karabeyoglu says. The technology is still in the demonstration phase, and would likely be used for years on smaller rockets before being considered for NASA's flagship launch vehicle.

But if the tests continue to go well, the launch director at Mission Control may one day mean it quite literally when she or he says, "All right, enough waiting around ... let's light this candle!"

Ovde

offline
  • Pridružio: 10 Feb 2005
  • Poruke: 3549

Pocinje odbrojavanje

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. - For the first time since the Columbia tragedy,
NASA's countdown clocks were ticking down the hours, minutes and seconds to launch, heightening the anticipation for a Wednesday liftoff of Discovery.


The countdown for the first space shuttle flight in 2 1/2 years began Sunday evening as Hurricane Dennis battered the Florida Panhandle off to the northwest. The mission's seven astronauts flew in from Houston on Saturday evening, a day early.

While Cape Canaveral was spared, Dennis still threatened to interfere with NASA's plans, with a week of thunderstorms on the horizon. Forecasters were hoping a ridge of high pressure would provide a break in the weather, however, and offered up fairly decent 70 percent odds for an on-time afternoon launch.

"It sure does feel good to be back in the saddle again. It's been too long," said payload manager Scott Higginbotham.

Test director Jeff Spaulding said excitement had been "building and growing" ever since the space agency overcame fuel-tank difficulties that prompted a launch delay a few months ago.

"It's only recently, I think, that it's all come to fruition where we can see the light at the end of the tunnel," Spaulding said.

"There's some excitement for people to get back to launching again and also, I think, maybe a quiet reserve as well, just remembering where we've been. But we all do feel confident that we've done it right."

Discovery will be making its first flight in four years when it takes off for the international space station with much-needed supplies and replacement parts.

Even before Columbia broke up during re-entry on Feb. 1, 2003, Discovery had been undergoing an extensive overhaul. The catastrophe prompted nearly 50 additional modifications, all of which will be demonstrated for the first time on this 12-day test flight. Techniques for inspecting the shuttle's thermal shield and fixing any holes also will be tested by the crew.

The biggest change, by far, is the redesigned external fuel tank.

Columbia's fuel tank lost a large chunk of foam insulation at liftoff. The debris slammed into the left wing, smashing a hole that proved catastrophic during re-entry. All seven astronauts were killed.

NASA removed the responsible section of foam and installed heaters in its place to prevent ice buildup from the super-chilled fuel. Just 1 1/2 months ago, engineers added a heater in another ice-prone spot on the tank; the work delayed the launch from May to July.

Managers also added extra checks for fuel-tank ice during the final portion of the countdown. Any significant patches of ice — which could be as lethal as flying foam — will mean a launch delay. Engineers considered putting infrared lamps at the pad to melt ice and covering vulnerable brackets with bags, but the ideas were scrapped, at least for now.

"With all the modifications, with all the improvements and changes and upgrades," Spaulding said, "certainly we can, without hesitation, say this will be the safest vehicle that we've ever had to launch."

That doesn't mean the tension level isn't high.

"It's a risky business so we're all sort of apprehensive," astronaut John Phillips said from the space station late last week. But he added, "I am fully confident that we've done what it takes to get this shuttle up here and I'm very anxious to see them come up here."

Ovde


Uprkos olujama,potvrdjen dan lansiranja

Nasa still hopes to launch space shuttle Discovery on Wednesday, despite the storms buffeting Florida as Hurricane Dennis hits the mainland US.

At a countdown status briefing, space agency officials re-stated their determination to fly Discovery on the first day of its July launch window.

There is said to be a 30% chance of bad weather stopping the launch on 13 July.

It will be the first shuttle launch since the Columbia disaster in 2003, which killed seven astronauts.

"Discovery is in excellent shape as we continue our preparations in anticipation of Wednesday's launch," Jeff Spaulding, Nasa test director told reporters here at the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) in Florida.


The US space agency (Nasa) officially set the launch countdown clock ticking on Sunday at 1800 EDT (2300 BST; 2200 GMT) for a scheduled launch at 1551 EDT (2051 BST; 1951 GMT) on Wednesday.

"Our main threat will be thunderstorms," said Kathy Winters, the shuttle weather officer. "With that we will have a 30% chance of KSC weather prohibiting launch."


DISCOVERY CREW - STS-114
STS-114 crew members (Nasa)
Commander Eileen Collins
Pilot James Kelly
Mission Specialist Andy Thomas
MS Charles Camarda
MS Wendy Lawrence
MS Soichi Noguchi
MS Steve Robinson
She added that if launch were to be delayed by 24 hours or 48 hours, the chances of cancelling launch due to high winds would rise to 40%.

Delaying Discovery's launch until after the weekend would do nothing to improve matters, Ms Winters explained, because hurricane centres expect other tropical storms to build over the next few days.

Discovery's seven-strong crew arrived at Cape Canaveral on Saturday evening - a day earlier than expected - because of Hurricane Dennis, which has blown in off the Gulf of Mexico.

Their time before launch on Wednesday will be spent carrying out simulations and, for Discovery's pilot James Kelly and Commander Eileen Collins, trying out difficult landing scenarios in a test aircraft.

Cold preparations

While the astronauts are busy with their preparations, engineers will load Discovery with the reactants to provide power while the vehicle is in orbit, conduct communications checkouts and retract the launch pad¿s rotating service structure to ready the vehicle for blast-off.

The shuttle's external tank will be cryogenically loaded with about 500,000 US gallons (two million litres) of propellants on Wednesday at 0600 EDT (11 00 BST; 1000 GMT).

"We're excited to be where we are now,' said Scott Higginbotham, Discovery's payload manager.

"It's taken almost three years for us to put this hardware together, take it apart, put it back together, take it apart."

The STS-114, Return to Flight Mission is due to last 12 days, with a landing set for 25 July at 1100 EDT (1600 BST; 1500 GMT) on the landing strip at the Kennedy Space Center.

It will carry spare parts and other equipment to the International Space Station.

Ovde


Postavljen satl

Nasa has said space shuttle Discovery is "buttoned up" and ready to fly as the launch countdown clock ticks.

Officials said they were "tracking no significant issues" as engineers made final preparations for lift-off from the Kennedy Space Center on Wednesday.

But they are watching the weather; a tropical depression to the south could turn into a hurricane in the next few days, meteorological experts say.

Discovery's mission is the first since Columbia broke apart in 2003.


We realise that the whole world will be looking at us on launch day
Stephanie Stilson, Nasa
This will be the most closely scrutinised shuttle launch ever. The shuttle will be tracked by cameras and radar to inspect for any debris that may damage the vehicle as it launches.

Unpredictable weather

"All of our hardware is onboard Discovery," said Scott Higginbotham, STS-114 payload manager. "We're buttoned up and ready to go."

But the unpredictable July weather could yet be an issue for launch.

Shuttle weather officer Kathy Winters told reporters that a weather system known as Tropical Depression 5 to the south could yet turn into a hurricane, to be known as Emily.

"We are not currently looking at any major issues that threaten the 13th. Obviously, weather is an unknown that we always have to deal with," vehicle manager Stephanie Stilson told the BBC News website.

"There are some paperwork-type issues that are still open. There is a slight chance - not very likely - that something will come out of the paperwork. But right now, we have very high confidence for the 13th."

Cameras are positioned on the ground, on planes, on the shuttle itself and on the International Space Station at different stages of flight to inspect for any possible damage.

According to US newspaper reports, also watching closely on 13 July will be a House and Senate delegation, as they consider Nasa's $16.6bn budget.

High expectations

Expectation weighs heavy on all involved in preparing the shuttle's return to flight.

"We realise that the whole world will be looking at us on launch day to make sure we're doing the right thing," said Stephanie Stilson. "It's important to Nasa, it's important to our government, it's important to our country and it's important to our international partners."

The window for launch will open at 1545 EDT (2045 BST; 1945 GMT) on Wednesday 13 July, and ground controllers will target the middle of this window - 1551 EDT (2051 BST; 1951 GMT) - for lift-off.

The mission is scheduled to last 12 days, with landing set for 1100 EDT (1600 BST; 1500 GMT) on 25 July at the Kennedy Space Center.

At 1530 EDT (2030 BST; 1930 GMT) on Monday, workers were to begin loading reactants into the shuttle's fuel-cell storage tanks, to provide the vehicle with power in orbit.

Loading of the shuttle's external fuel tank with cryogenic propellants to blast it beyond the atmosphere will begin at 0600 EDT (1100 BST; 1000 GMT) on Wednesday, approximately nine hours before launch.


Ovde

Odbrojavanje

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. -
NASA managers put a brief but embarrassing setback behind them as the countdown to the first space shuttle flight in 2 1/2 years entered its final hours Wednesday, with only predicted thunderstorms posing some concern.



A temporary window cover fell off the shuttle and damaged thermal tiles near the tail Tuesday afternoon, just two hours after NASA declared Discovery ready to return the nation to space for the first time since the Columbia disaster.

The mishap was an eerie reminder of the very thing that doomed Columbia — damage to the spaceship's fragile thermal shield.

Discovery and its crew of seven were set to blast off at 3:51 p.m. EDT on a flight to the international space station.

Fueling of the external tank, set to begin about an hour before sunrise, was delayed while workers changed a part on a launch-pad heater. NASA officials said the swapping out of the part wasn't expected to affect the launch time.

The lightweight plastic cover on one of Discovery's cockpit windows came loose while the spaceship was on the launch pad, falling more than 60 feet and striking a bulge in the fuselage, said Stephanie Stilson, the NASA manager in charge of Discovery's launch preparations.

No one knows why the cover — held in place with tape and weighing less than 2 pounds — fell off, she said. The covers are used prior to launch to protect the windows while the shuttle is on the launch pad, then removed before liftoff.

Two tiles on an aluminum panel were damaged, and the entire panel was replaced with a spare; Stilson called it a minor repair job.

Space agency managers held one last meeting Tuesday to address lingering technical concerns and later pronounced Discovery ready to fly.

"We have done everything that we know to do," NASA Administrator Michael Griffin said afterward.

The families of the seven astronauts killed during Columbia's catastrophic re-entry praised the accident investigators, a NASA oversight group and the space agency itself for defining and reducing the dangers.

Like those who lost loved ones in the Apollo 1 spacecraft fire and the Challenger launch explosion, the Columbia families said they grieve deeply "but know the exploration of space must go on."

"We hope we have learned and will continue to learn from each of these accidents so that we will be as safe as we can be in this high-risk endeavor," they said in a statement. "Godspeed, Discovery."

Discovery will be setting off on the 114th space shuttle flight in 24 years with a redesigned external fuel tank and nearly 50 other improvements made in the wake of the Columbia tragedy.

A chunk of foam insulation the size of a carry-on suitcase fell off Columbia's fuel tank at liftoff and slammed into a reinforced carbon panel on the shuttle's wing, creating a hole that brought the spacecraft crashing down in pieces during its return to Earth on Feb. 1, 2003.

During their 12-day flight, Discovery's astronauts will test various techniques for patching razbijacs and holes in the thermal shielding.

The crew members also will try out a new 50-foot boom designed to give them a three-dimensional laser view of the wings and nose cap and help them find any damage caused by liftoff debris. That is on top of all the pictures of the spacecraft that will be taken by more than 100 cameras positioned around the launching site and aboard two planes and the shuttle itself.

Until the window cover fell, NASA's only concern was the weather. Because of thunderstorms in the forecast, the chances of acceptable weather at launch time were put at 60 percent, down from 70 percent a day earlier.

"We're just hoping that the weather gods are kind," Griffin said. "Weather's always out there. We'll just deal with it as it comes."

Ovde

Odlozeno lansiranje


Space buffs from Tokyo to Indianapolis were disappointed and frustrated over the delay in launching space shuttle Discovery amid concerns over a faulty fuel-tank sensor.

The mission was put off at least until Saturday.

"Again?" Emi Tanaka, 26, said in dismay after trekking to a giant screen in downtown Tokyo with three other friends after a late night of work. The group had hopes of watching the liftoff around dawn, Tokyo time. A flight targeted for late May had earlier been set back by two months.

The launch had been set for live screening at the busy plaza in Tokyo's Shinjuku district and on local TV networks.

The inclusion of Japanese astronaut and local celebrity Soichi Noguchi in the shuttle crew of seven had boosted interest for this mission in Japan.

In the United States,
NASA had electronically linked with at least six museums to show the launch live on giant screens. The space agency invited teachers and schoolchildren — many of them from disadvantaged inner-city and rural schools — to the
Kennedy Space Center. For weeks, NASA has been promoting what the agency calls its "Return to Flight" outreach program.

"We're encouraging these students to pursue math and science careers," said NASA's chief education officer Adena Williams Loston. "They will be the Mars walkers."

Discovery's launch would mark the first shuttle flight since the Columbia tragedy 2 1/2 years ago, when the spacecraft disintegrated during its rapid descent toward Cape Canaveral, Fla., killing all seven astronauts aboard.

Even educators could not hide their apprehension.

"This now makes me a little nervous," said Deb Lawson, Spacequest Planetarium coordinator at the Children's Museum of Indianapolis. "Coming back from any kind of a tragedy and being able to accomplish something major is extraordinarily important."

After the scrub, space agency officials and VIPs tried, but failed to hide their disappointment.

"All I can say is shucks," deputy shuttle program manager Wayne Hale said as he sat among grim-faced NASA managers at a news conference.

U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson (news, bio, voting record), a Florida Democrat, flew on shuttle Columbia in 1986 and experienced four scrubs before launch. He said Discovery's crew was bound to be disappointed, but only briefly.

"Then you realize you don't want to be launched with a problem," Nelson said.

The space agency has until the end of July to launch Discovery, after which it will have to wait until September — a window dictated by both the position of the space station and NASA's desire to hold a daylight liftoff in order to photograph the shuttle during its climb to orbit.



Ovde

Problem sa gorivom na Discovery-iju odlozio lansiranje

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. - The astronauts had already climbed aboard the shuttle Discovery when
NASA halted the countdown with just 2 1/2 hours to go, scrubbing the first shuttle flight since the 2003 Columbia tragedy because of a fuel-gauge problem.


Shuttle managers had no idea whether Wednesday's trouble was in the gauge at the bottom of Discovery's fuel tank, a stretch of cabling and wiring, an electronics box inside the shuttle or something else entirely.

And they found themselves on the defensive, explaining why they pressed ahead with the launch when the same type of potentially fatal problem cropped up during a fueling test just three months ago and was accepted as an "unexplained anomaly."

Some engineers had pushed for further testing at the pad before committing to a liftoff, but were overruled by top managers who concluded that the replacement of cables, the electronics box and the tank itself was ample.

"We felt like we had a good system," deputy shuttle program manager Wayne Hale said at a grim-faced news conference Wednesday.

"We became comfortable as a group, as a management team, that this was an acceptable posture to go fly in," he said, "and we also knew that if something were to happen during a launch countdown, we would do this test and we would find it. And guess what? We did the test, we found something and we stopped. We took no risk. We're not flying with this."

Even if NASA had conducted another fueling test in June, Hale said it's unclear whether the fuel gauge would have malfunctioned the way it did in a checkout test: Instead of showing an empty tank, the gauge kept showing full.

The disappointment came just a day after an embarrassing turn for NASA, when a plastic cockpit window cover fell off the shuttle and damaged its fragile thermal tiles before the spacecraft had even taken off.

The launch was delayed until at least Saturday, and the postponement could last much longer, depending on the repairs needed.

NASA halted the countdown shortly after the seven astronauts climbed aboard for their journey to the international space station. Until then, the only threat to the mission was thunderstorms, which rained on the astronauts as they made their way to the launch pad.

From Cape Canaveral, where congressmen and astronaut families had come to witness the awe-inspiring sight of a rocket launch, to museums across the country where schoolchildren had gathered, the delay of the long-awaited return to space was disheartening.

"I wanted to see it really, really, really bad," groaned 8-year-old Michael Schamtin of Sherwood, Ore., who had waited for liftoff at the Oregon Museum of Science and Industry.

Shuttle managers said it was unclear whether Discovery could be fixed at the pad or would need to be returned to the hangar for more extensive repairs. They expected to have a better idea on Thursday — "but I wouldn't guarantee it," said Steve Poulos, a shuttle manager.

NASA has until the end of July to launch Discovery; otherwise it must wait until September. The launch windows are dictated by both the position of the space station and NASA's desire to hold a daylight liftoff in order to photograph the spacecraft during its climb to orbit.

When the shuttle finally takes off, the astronauts will test new techniques for inspecting and repairing razbijacs and holes similar to the damage that doomed Columbia in 2003.

Thousands of people had descended on the space center for the launch, including John Glenn, the first American to orbit the Earth, members of Congress, and family members of the seven fallen Columbia astronauts. Lawmakers and others refrained from second-guessing NASA's decision to press ahead before it had gotten to the bottom of the fuel gauge problem.


"I'm disappointed for all of us," said Sen. Bill Nelson (news, bio, voting record), D-Fla. But he added, "The system is working like it should."

Just a day earlier, the window cover caused damage to some of Discovery's thermal tiles — the very thing that NASA had worked so hard to avoid after Columbia's wing was pierced at liftoff by a chunk of foam insulation from the fuel tank. Discovery's tiles were quickly replaced.

In the 2 1/2 years since Columbia broke apart on its return to Earth, NASA has worked to fix its "safety culture," which the accident investigators concluded broke down during the flight. The space agency said it has had frank and vigorous discussions about the upcoming flight — including the fuel gauge problem — and encouraged engineers to speak up.

NASA also has concentrated on making the external fuel tank safer by reducing the risk that foam insulation, ice or other debris will break off at launch. The gauge that caused trouble on Wednesday is in the external fuel tank, but was unrelated to any of the safety modifications.

The space agency requires all four hydrogen-fuel gauges to be working to ensure that the main engines shut off at the precise moment in space. If the engines shut down too soon or too late because of an erroneous gauge reading, the results could be catastrophic. For instance, the engines could rupture if they kept running after the tank sprang a leak and ran out of fuel.

The space agency is looking closely at the possibility that flawed transistors in an electronic "black box" aboard Discovery might be to blame. The box used in the April test also had bad transistors, and when it was removed from the shuttle, the problem disappeared. Managers suspect a manufacturing defect with these transistors.

Shuttle program manager Bill Parsons stressed that the problem could be anywhere.

"This has to be looked at from end to end," he said. "We kind of need to keep our mind open."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050714/ap_on_sc/space_shuttle;_ylt=A86.I0etR9ZCzEYBdySs0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3MzV0MTdmBHNlYwM3NTM-]Ovde[/url]

[b]NASA proucava problem sa gorivom

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. - Hundreds of engineers are scrambling to figure out why a fuel gauge on the space shuttle Discovery failed right before its scheduled launch. Meanwhile,
NASA is clinging to the possibility that it might be able to make another attempt on Sunday.

Deputy shuttle program manager Wayne Hale said the fix would have to be fast and simple, though, to have Discovery ready by then. Most likely, NASA's first mission since the 2003 Columbia disaster will require more complicated repairs and be delayed into next week or even September, depending on the extent of work needed.

"Everybody is tremendously disappointed," said Michael Wetmore, director of space shuttle processing. "But everybody was also here 2 1/2 years ago and saw that we failed in our mission to protect the crew. So there's no one who wants to go forward with a potential risk to the crew that hasn't been appropriately analyzed and addressed."

NASA remains stumped as to why one of four hydrogen-fuel gauges in Discovery's external fuel tank malfunctioned during a routine pre-launch test Wednesday.

The seven astronauts were already on board, liftoff was little more than two hours away and the astronauts' families, members of Congress and space buffs around the world were eagerly waiting. The 12-day mission was loaded with interesting challenges that called for testing new safety and repair methods and delivering supplies to the international space station.

But everything came to a halt when launch controllers sent information mimicking an empty fuel tank. One of the fuel gauges remained stuck on "full."

Hours later, long after the tank was emptied, the troublesome gauge finally started working. That makes it an intermittent problem, Hale said, "which is the worst kind of thing to troubleshoot."

The problem could be in the gauge at the bottom of the tank — an electronic box aboard the shuttle that serves as a data-relay hub — or in the cables and wires in between.

The fuel gauges are critical and even though only two are needed, all four must be working properly for a launch to proceed. Hale said these low-level fuel gauges never failed until April, when two malfunctioned during a fueling test of Discovery's original tank. That tank was later replaced for other safety reasons.

If the fuel tank was empty but the sensors indicated full, the engine turbines would spin too fast and likely rupture — possibly damaging the tail of the spacecraft and dooming the crew. A ground test that accidentally caused that to happen back in the early 1980s resulted in severe "uncontained" damage, Hale said.

NASA is loath to repeat such a test on the shuttle's new and stronger turbopumps, Hale said.

On the other end of the scale, if the sensors were to trigger a premature shutdown of the main engines on the way to orbit, the shuttle would be forced to attempt a dangerous emergency landing in Europe or elsewhere.

"None of those options are really what you'd like to have happen to you," Hale said.

Workers will need to enter Discovery's engine compartment to get to the electronic box that is associated with the fuel gauges. The box contains transistors that may not have been assembled correctly.

NASA has a spare box ready to put in, but the device is exhibiting a signal interference problem and may not be reliable. If engineers have to put together a box from scratch, the work could take anywhere from 10 days to three weeks, Hale said.

It will be considerably more complicated if workers have to reach the fuel gauges themselves inside the tank.

NASA is up against the clock. If Discovery isn't flying by the end of July, the shuttle must remain grounded until September to ensure a daylight liftoff for good camera views — a requirement for spotting any damage during launch. That's one of the many changes called for by the Columbia accident investigators.

When Columbia blasted off on its doomed mission, NASA had no clear pictures of the foam insulation hitting the left wing and knocking a hole in it. The gash caused the spacecraft to break apart during re-entry on Feb. 1, 2003, killing all seven astronauts.

Ovde


Neznaju kada ce poleteti

NASA's first shuttle flight in more than two years has been put off indefinitely as the space agency mounts a massive investigation into why a fuel gauge failed right before Discovery's scheduled liftoff.

"We are going forward on a day-by-day basis," said deputy shuttle program manager Wayne Hale. "We have got the entire resources of the agency behind us to troubleshoot this problem."

Hale said that once the problem was identified and fixed, it would be another four days before the shuttle could launch.

"Everybody is going to want to ask, 'What is that date going to be?' Well, I don't know," he said.

It was the latest setback in NASA's grueling and drawn-out quest to return to space and recover from the 2003 Columbia tragedy. The space agency has made a multitude of safety improvements to the aging shuttle to avoid future catastrophes, efforts that have repeatedly delayed Discovery's mission.

Engineers are looking at whether any of those safety improvements — like additional heaters on the external fuel tank to prevent dangerous ice buildup — may be contributing to the failure of one of the four fuel gauges in the tank. When the gauge showed an improper setting, Wednesday's launch was canceled.

Hale said it's possible NASA could try to launch again late next week, "but that would require a very near-term lucky find" of the source of the problem.

Discovery's seven astronauts opted to remain in Cape Canaveral and wait it out, rather than return to their homes in Houston.

Managers had held out hope, however slim, that they might be able to launch Discovery within a few days. But with engineers no closer to figuring out why the fuel sensor malfunctioned Wednesday — a potentially deadly problem — NASA had no choice but to call for a lengthy standdown.

NASA is up against the clock. If extensive repairs are needed and the shuttle has to be moved off the launch pad and into the hangar, the flight could end up being bumped into September to ensure a daylight liftoff.

The space agency wants a clear view of the ascending shuttle in order to spot any launch damage. When combined with the constantly changing location of the international space station, Discovery's destination, this means that the shuttle must fly by the end of July or remain grounded until Sept. 9.

"We are not in any sense of the word becoming pessimistic about making the July launch window," Hale stressed to reporters. "We are here for the duration. We are committed to giving this the good, old college try until we get the problem resolved."

For the second full day, 12 teams of engineers around the country pored through data for clues as to why the hydrogen-fuel sensor failed during Wednesday's routine pre-launch test.

It was the same type of problem that marred a fueling test of Discovery in April. NASA replaced an electronic box and cables associated with the fuel gauge, as well as the fuel tank itself for other reasons, and chalked the failure up as an "unexplained anomaly."

This time, NASA is considering every angle, including the effects of a fully fueled spacecraft with all its systems running, said John Muratore, shuttle systems engineering manager.

Hale also suggested for the first time that if the problem can't be explained after days or weeks of effort, NASA might be forced to consider flying with the fuel gauge mystery unsolved.

The fuel gauges are needed to make sure a shuttle's main engines don't run too long or not long enough on the climb to orbit. Either case could prove deadly.

NASA's three surviving shuttles have been grounded ever since Columbia shattered in the sky over Texas on Feb. 1, 2003, killing all seven astronauts. A chunk of fuel-tank foam insulation came loose during liftoff and pierced the left wing, sending the spacecraft on a deadly descent two weeks later.

Ovde

offline
  • Pridružio: 18 Dec 2003
  • Poruke: 7953
  • Gde živiš: Graceland

Discovery launch unlikely before July 26: NASA

Houston, July 19. (PTI):NASA is yet to determine the reason for its failure to launch the Discovery space shuttle last week and does not expect a dispatch of the same till July 26.

NASA managers said they were still trying to send the shuttle Discovery into space on the first flight since the 2003 Columbia disaster within the launch window open until July 31.

"Troubleshooting is continuing around the clock," Space Shuttle Programme Manager Bill Parsons said at a press conference yesterday.

"This team is persistent and energetic and we will conquer this problem too. Once the problem is resolved the next opportunity to tank the vehicle would be Tuesday, the 26th of July." Programme Deputy Manager Wayne Hale said.

Hale is hopeful that this week the problem could be identified and NASA managers are still optimistic about a launch within the current window, which ends July 31.

"Right now, I can tell you that we're still looking for the problem," Parsons said. "We've waited two-plus years, 2 1/2 years to be here. We're trying awfully hard to resolve this issue."

The first attempt was called off last week because of a glitch with a fuel sensor designed to shut off the shuttle's three main engines before fuel runs out to avoid damaging them.

http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/001200507191133.htm

offline
  • Pridružio: 10 Feb 2005
  • Poruke: 3549

NASA sprema misije na Mars i Mesec

WASHINGTON - The House Friday overwhelmingly endorsed
President Bush's vision to send man back to the moon and eventually on to Mars as it passed a bill to set
NASA policy for the next two years.


The bill passed 383-15 after a collegial debate in which lawmakers stressed their commitment to not just Bush's ambitious space exploration plans but also to traditional NASA programs such as science and aeronautics.

There is some tension between Congress and the White House over the balance between Bush's vision for space exploration and other NASA initiatives. Originally, the measure would have shifted $1.3 billion in funds from exploration to other NASA programs. But after administration objections lawmakers added the money back to the budget for exploration during floor debate. That was done by adding to the bill's bottom line — now at $34.7 billion — not at the expense of science and aeronautics.

Democratic Rep. Bart Gordon (news, bio, voting record) of Tennessee said Bush's ambitious moon and Mars missions "should not be done by cannibalizing other NASA missions."

The bill is the first NASA policy measure — its budget is funded by a separate bill — to pass the House in five years. It advanced as the space agency tries to rebound from the Columbia disaster in February 2003 with the launch of the space shuttle Discovery next Tuesday.

The measure permits but does not explicitly endorse retiring the space shuttle fleet by 2010, as the administration would like to do. It directs the agency to launch a new crew exploration vehicle — which would lack the full capabilities of the shuttle but could travel to the
International Space Station — as close to 2010 as feasible.

NASA's plans call for a new vehicle to be ready by 2014, which unnerves lawmakers who do not want the United States to have to rely on other countries to catch a lift to the space station.

A companion Senate measure approved by the Commerce, Science and Transportation panel last month would bar NASA from retiring the shuttle before a replacement vehicle is ready.

Both House and Senate bills also endorse a servicing and repair mission to the
Hubble Space Telescope. Without such a mission, the Hubble will fail when its gyroscopes and batteries wear out in the next few years, but the agency has not announced whether to let the telescope fail or whether it will undertake a costly manned repair mission.

"Congress endorses the President's Vision for Space Exploration," said Rep. Sherwood Boehlert (news, bio, voting record), R-N.Y. "The United States will work to return to the moon by 2020, and then will move on to other destinations."

The full Senate has yet to act on the NASA measure.

Regardless of the ringing endorsement Friday, NASA must still compete with other agencies for its budget in the annual appropriations process, which moves on a separate track. That promises to make it difficult to fulfill all of the policy recommendations made by the House on Friday.

Still, there was one lone voice against the bill. Rep. Barney Frank (news, bio, voting record), D-Mass., questioned spending billions to go to Mars when "day after day ... we're told we can't do enough for housing and we can't do enough for health care."

"This is a fundamental debate the country ought to have ... about whether or not to commit these untold billions ... at the expense of other important programs," he said.

Ovde

Ko je trenutno na forumu
 

Ukupno su 1241 korisnika na forumu :: 61 registrovanih, 7 sakrivenih i 1173 gosta   ::   [ Administrator ] [ Supermoderator ] [ Moderator ] :: Detaljnije

Najviše korisnika na forumu ikad bilo je 3466 - dana 01 Jun 2021 17:07

Korisnici koji su trenutno na forumu:
Korisnici trenutno na forumu: A.R.Chafee.Jr., Acivi, amaterSRB, Andrija357, armor, ArmyBoss, Atomski čoban, Battlehammer, bojankrstc, BRATORIII, ccoogg123, comi_pfc, crnitrn, dane007, Dannyboy, darcaud, darkangel, dekan.m, Dimitrije Paunovic, dragoljub11987, Georgius, Gosha101980, goxin, hooraay, hyla, JimmyNapoli, karevski, Levi, Lieutenant, Marko Marković, mgolub, Mi lao shu, milenko crazy north, Mixelotti, moldway, Ne doznajem se u oružje, nebkv, ObelixSRB, operniki, Oscar, panzerwaffe, pein, Rakenica, royst33, Shinobi, Sir Budimir, slonic_tonic, SR-3m, Srle993, suton, Tragač, Tvrtko I, VJ, vlad4, Vlada1389, Vlada78, voja64, VP6919, Wrangler, YugoSlav, 1107